洞穴奇案的十四種判決-轻识

Lon Fuller?s Case of the Speluncean Exp/ ~rers is the greatest fictitious legal case of all

time. That is saying a lot, for it has some stiff competition. While its competitors

may outdo it in courtroom drama, character development, or investigative

suspense, none matches it in legal depth or dialectical agility It shows not what

makes some lawyer?s caseload interesting, but wh...

Lon Fuller?s Case of the Speluncean Exp/ ~rers is the greatest fictitious legal case of all

time. That is saying a lot, for it has some stiff competition. While its competitors

may outdo it in courtroom drama, character development, or investigative

suspense, none matches it in legal depth or dialectical agility It shows not what

makes some lawyer?s caseload interesting, but what makes law itself interesting. It

would not make a good movie; it is all ?talking heads.? In fact, the parts that

would make a good movie - the events within the cave - are over and done with

by the time Fuller begins his piece. Moreover, these events are not depicted with

cinematic vivacity, but described after the fact with judicial precision and bland-

ness.

Fuller?s live Supreme Court justices tranquilly but rigorously show the

complexity of the facts and the flexibility of legal reasoning. The live opinions

focus on different factual details and legal precedents, and lit them into different

background structures of legal and political principle. By these means Fuller

crystallizes important conflicts of principle and illustrates the major schools of

legal philosophy in his day. Fuller?s case has been called ?a classic in jurispru-

dence,? ? a microcosm of this century?s debates,? and a ?breathtaking intellectual

accomplishment.?*

Although only half a century separates us from the date of Fuller?s essay, the

legal landscape has changed profoundly. I have written nine new judicial opin-

ions on his case, with roughly Fuller?s own objectives in view, hoping to explore

important issues of principle and in the process to bring the depiction of legal

philosophy up to date.

While I would like to depict the major schools of legal philosophy today,

giving each its due, there are a few obstacles that subtly constrain the project.

Suber, Peter. Case of the Speluncean Explorers: Nine New Opinions.

Florence, KY, USA: Routledge, 1998. p ix.

http://site.ebrary.com/lib/cityu/Doc?id=2003075&ppg=9

Preface

Introduction1

Pt. ILon Fuller's Case of the Speluncean Explorers5

Opinion of Chief Justice Truepenny7

Opinion of Justice Foster10

Opinion of Justice Tatting15

Opinion of Justice Keen20

Opinion of Justice Handy25

Opinion of Justice Tatting31

Postscript32

Pt. IINine New Opinions33

Opinion of Chief Justice Burnham35

Opinion of Justice Springham45

Opinion of Justice Tally57

Opinion of Justice Hellen64

Opinion of Justice Trumpet73

Opinion of Justice Goad79

Opinion of Justice Frank89

Opinion of Justice Reckon91

Opinion of Justice Bond99

Index108

萨伯(Peter suber，1951- )，影响甚广的“开放近用运动”(open Access Movement，提倡在科研文献发表的同时，将电子文本在网上公布，以便读者免费取阅)的发起人。1973年毕业于美国叶尔汉姆学院，1978年获西北大学哲学博士学位。长期担任叶尔汉姆学院哲学教授，也讲授法律、计算机等其他课程。萨伯从事很多领域的社会活动，兼任SPARC(“学者出版与学术资源联盟”)高级研究员和耶鲁大学法学院信息社会项目访问学者等多项职务，还是两家网站(openaccessnews和ODenaccessletters)的博客作者。1991年出版专著《自我修正的悖论》。